Speaker diarization: Libraries & APIs for developers

October 14, 2024
10 Min
In-Video AI
Jump to
Share
This is some text inside of a div block.

Speaker diarization answers a simple question: 'Who spoke what and when?' It breaks the audio into segments, each corresponding to different speakers, and helps separate multiple voices in a conversation.

What is Speaker Diarization?


Let’s understand with a detailed example

Suppose you have two transcripts from a webinar/podcast, and your task is to document the key points from them.

The first transcript is in this format

“Welcome to our webinar on video technology. I’m Alex, and with me is Jamie. Today, we’re diving into the essentials of video tech. Ready to get started? Absolutely! Excited to explore this topic. Let’s start with the basics. Modern video systems have four key components: capture, encoding, streaming, and playback. Could you explain the capture process?”

In this transcript, you’re left guessing who said what. Was it Alex or Jamie? This can makes it challenging to extract important points, organize the information, or even create proper documentation.

The second transcript however was different

Speaker 1: Welcome to our webinar on video technology. I’m Alex, and with me is Jamie. Today, we’re diving into the essentials of video tech. Ready to get started, Jamie?

Speaker 2: Absolutely, Alex! Excited to explore this topic.

Speaker 1: Let’s start with the basics. Modern video systems have four key components: capture, encoding, streaming, and playback. Jamie, could you explain the capture process?

In this transcript, you get the clear transcript of “who spoke what” because of speaker diarization or detection to differentiate the speaker, making life easier. In this blog we’ll talk about how speaker diarization works, different use cases and challenges.

Understanding the mechanism of speaker diarization


The process begins by segmenting audio into parts based on acoustic changes, such as pauses or shifts in tone. Then, unique voice features like pitch and rhythm are extracted from each segment. These features are grouped into clusters, with each cluster ideally representing a different speaker.

Here's a detailed breakdown of the process:

Audio segmentation: The first step involves splitting the audio into smaller segments, usually based on changes in the acoustic environment. This might include pauses between speakers or shifts in tone, which indicate a new speaker.

Feature extraction: Once the audio is segmented, the next step is to extract features from each segment. These features typically include Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs), which capture the unique characteristics of a speaker's voice, such as pitch, tone, and rhythm.

Definition of Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs)

Clustering: The extracted features are then grouped or clustered based on similarity. Each cluster ideally represents a different speaker. Advanced clustering techniques, like Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs) or k-means clustering, are often used to distinguish between different voices.

In machine learning, clustering is an unsupervised learning approach where the model identifies patterns and groups within the data based on their inherent characteristics. For speaker diarization, clustering algorithms like k-means or Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM) analyze acoustic features (e.g., pitch, tone) to distinguish between different speakers. The accuracy of speaker diarization heavily relies on the effectiveness of these clustering algorithms, as they must precisely identify subtle differences in voice characteristics to accurately assign segments to the correct speaker.

Speaker identification: In some cases, diarization systems can go beyond just differentiating speakers and actually identify them. This involves comparing the extracted features against a database of known voices.

Practical applications of speaker diarization


Audio content is everywhere from podcasts to interviews to virtual meetings. But when multiple people speak, it can become a jumbled mess of voices. Speaker diarization helps to transform this chaotic audio into clear, structured data. By accurately distinguishing between different speakers, it allows listeners to follow conversations more easily, and for automated systems to generate more precise transcripts. Whether you’re producing a podcast or reviewing a recorded meeting, speaker diarization cuts through the noise, delivering clarity and order.

Legal

In legal cases and compliance audits, accuracy is key. Speaker diarization ensures that the right voice is linked to the right statements, making it clear who said what. This accuracy helps maintain the integrity of legal processes and supports organizations in meeting strict compliance standards. By avoiding mistakes and improving record reliability, speaker diarization provides a legal and ethical advantage in high-stakes situations.

Customer experience revolution

Every interaction matters in customer experience. Businesses are now using speaker diarization to personalize customer experiences, especially in busy call centers. By turning chaotic, multi-speaker conversations into actionable insights, companies can better understand customer needs, improve response times, and even train AI systems to offer more relevant solutions. This technology transforms how businesses interact with customers, making each engagement more tailored and efficient.

Empowering accessibility

Accessibility is more than a buzzword; it’s a necessity. Speaker diarization empowers content creators and broadcasters by clearly identifying different speakers in videos and live streams. This makes it easier to create accurate subtitles and transcripts, ensuring that people with hearing impairments can follow along just as easily as anyone else. By breaking down audio barriers, speaker diarization plays a vital role in making content more inclusive and accessible to all.

Challenges in speaker diarization


Even advanced models like speaker diarization have their limitations.
Let’s take a closer look at the common challenges that often occur:

Overlap of audio

Handling overlapping speech in speaker diarization can be challenging, especially when multiple people talk at the same time. It's like trying to separate voices that are all tangled together, making it hard to tell who is saying what. Even with advanced algorithms, it’s still tough to accurately identify individual speakers in these moments.

Lot of background noise

Imagine trying to have a conversation in a crowded room or over a bad phone connection the same difficulties apply to the technology. Whether it’s the hum of an air conditioner, street noise, or low-quality microphones, extraneous sounds can confuse the system, leading to misidentified or missed speakers. Despite improvements, noise remains a persistent challenge that can trip up even the best diarization tools.

When voices blend

When speakers have similar pitch, tone, or speaking style, the technology can struggle to accurately separate them. This challenge is especially pronounced in scenarios with large groups or professional settings where vocal similarities are common. The subtle nuances that differentiate one voice from another can be easily blurred, leading to errors in speaker identification.

Tech limitations and realities

Current systems are not infallible and can make mistakes, especially in challenging audio environments. It’s important to set realistic expectations about the accuracy of these tools. These technologies are not perfect—misattributions, missed speakers, and errors in complex audio scenarios are still possible. Understanding these limitations help in better utilizing the technology and in continuing to push the boundaries of what can be achieved.

Metrics for speaker diarization


Metrics in speaker diarization are needed for evaluating accuracy, guiding improvements, and ensuring performance across diverse scenarios. They provide objective benchmarks, enabling developers to compare different models, understand trade-offs, and refine their systems. By quantifying specific aspects like Diarization Error Rate (DER) and Boundary Error Rate (BER), metrics help identify areas that need improvement, ensuring the system accurately segments and labels speakers. Let’s talk about the different metrics.

Diarization error rate (DER)

Diarization error rate (DER) is the most widely used metric for evaluating speaker diarization systems. It quantifies the percentage of speaker time that is incorrectly labeled. DER includes three types of errors: missed speech, false alarms (incorrectly labeled non-speech as speech), and speaker confusion (misattributing speech to the wrong speaker).

How it's calculated:

  • Missed speech: The system fails to identify parts of the audio where a speaker is present.
  • False alarm: The system detects speech where there isnone.
  • Speaker confusion: The system attributes speech to the wrong speaker.

The DER formula is:


For example, if a 10-minute conversation contains 1 minute of missed speech, 30 seconds of false alarms, and 2 minutes of speaker confusion, the DER would be 15%.


A lower DER indicates better performance. However, DER does not account for overlaps (two speakers talking simultaneously), so in scenarios with overlapping speech, additional metrics may be needed.

Video Editing API for developers

Try for free

Normalized mutual information (NMI)

Normalized mutual information (NMI) quantifies how much information about the true speaker labels is preserved in the diarization system’s clusters. It evaluates the mutual dependence between the reference and predicted clusters, balancing cluster purity and completeness.


How it’s calculated:
NMI uses the following formula

Where I(C;L) represents clusters, clusters C and true speaker labels L, and H(C) and H(L) are the entropies of the cluster and label distributions, respectively.

NMI provides a good balance between how well the system keeps speakers separate (purity) and how completely it captures all the speech from each speaker (completeness). It's especially useful for systems where both aspects are critical.

Boundary error rate (BER)

Boundary error rate (BER) measures how accurately the system detects the points where one speaker stops talking, and another starts. In other words, it evaluates the system’s ability to correctly place speaker change boundaries.

In applications like transcription, where knowing exactly when a speaker changes is crucial, BER is a key metric. If the system frequently misplaces speaker boundaries, it could lead to confusing transcripts or misunderstandings in applications like automated meeting analysis.

Homogeneity, completeness, and v-measure

These three metrics provide additional insights into the clustering performance of speaker diarization systems:

  • Homogeneity: Measures whether each cluster contains only one speaker. High homogeneity means the system doesn't mix different speakers in the same cluster.
  • Completeness: Measures whether all instances of a single speaker are assigned to the same cluster. High completeness indicates that all speech segments from the same speaker are grouped together.
  • V-measure: The harmonic mean of homogeneity and completeness. It balances both metrics, providing a single score that reflects the overall clustering performance.

Open-source libraries for speaker diarization


There are several open-source libraries available that can help you implement speaker diarization in your projects. Here’s a list of some of the most popular and useful ones:

pyAudioAnalysis

Python library that offers various audio analysis functionalities, including speaker diarization. That includes methods for speaker segmentation and clustering. It’s user-friendly and can be easily integrated into your Python projects.
GitHub: pyAudioAnalysis


Kaldi

A powerful and widely-used toolkit for speech recognition that also includes tools for speaker diarization. Kaldi provides state-of-the-art algorithms for speaker segmentation, clustering, and acoustic feature extraction. It is highly customizable and supports large-scale speech processing tasks. GitHub: Kaldi


pyannotate

An open-source library designed for speaker diarization with a focus on easy to use and integration with existing pipelines. Provides simple APIs for speaker segmentation and diarization. GitHub: pyannotate


SpeechBrain

All-in-one toolkit for speech processing, including speaker diarization. Offers pre-trained models for diarization tasks, with the ability to fine-tune and adapt them to specific needs. It is built on PyTorch, making it easy to extend and customize. GitHub: SpeechBrain


pyannote-audio

A Python library focused on neural network-based speaker diarization. Provides end-to-end diarization systems, including speaker segmentation, embedding extraction, and clustering GitHub: pyannote-audio

Speaker diarization with FastPix

At FastPix we understand the growing importance of clear, accurate communication in the age of video and audio content. Speaker diarization is no longer just a "nice-to-have" feature it’s essential in transforming unstructured audio into meaningful, accessible data. Whether it's in legal settings, customer service interactions, or creating accessible content for all audiences, diarization technology ensures that conversations are easy to follow and accurately documented.

As the world of video and audio continues to change, FastPix remains committed to providing the tools you need to stay ahead. Speaker diarization is just one of the many ways we're helping companies and creators turn their content into powerful, actionable data.

Explore our AI features today to see how speaker diarization and other video technology solutions can enhance your projects, streamline workflows, and drive better outcomes for your business.

Know more

Enjoyed reading? You might also like

Try FastPix today!

FastPix grows with you – from startups to growth stage and beyond.