For developers working with video streaming platforms, codec selection can make or break the user experience. Choosing the right codec is not just about compressing video; it’s about balancing quality, performance, and resource utilization. With AV1, H.264, and H.265 being the most widely discussed codecs, this guide will help you understand their strengths, weaknesses, and when to use each one in your development workflow.
Codecs are the engines behind video compression, allowing developers to efficiently deliver content to users with varying network conditions, devices, and bandwidth. Whether you're working on live streaming, video-on-demand (VOD), or conferencing platforms, the codec you choose can drastically impact your streaming performance.
Now that we have a better understanding of codecs and some of the most popular ones, let's take a closer look at AV1, H.264, and H.265 to explore their unique features and differences.
AV1 (AO media video 1) is a modern video codec developed by the Alliance for open media, a consortium of major tech companies including Google, Apple, and Microsoft. AV1 is designed to offer superior compression efficiency and high video quality while being open-source and royalty-free. This codec supports high-definition (HD) and ultra-high-definition (UHD) video, making it a great choice for high-quality streaming.
Key features:
H.265 (High-efficiency video coding, HEVC is the successor to H.264, developed by ISO/MPEG and ITU-T video coding experts group. H.265 enhances video quality and compression efficiency, supporting higher resolutions like 4K and HDR. Although it delivers better performance compared to H.264, it comes with complex licensing fees and variable support across different platforms.
Key features:
H.264, also known as Advanced video coding (AVC), is a widely used codec that compresses and transmits video efficiently across various platforms. As a predecessor to H.265, H.264 is known for its broad compatibility and efficient performance. It remains a popular choice due to its extensive device support and lower encoding costs.
Key features:
For a clear and concise comparison of AV1, H.265, and H.264, you can check the table below. It highlights the key features and differences between these codecs to help you make an informed choice:
To provide a comprehensive understanding of how AV1, H.264, and H.265 (HEVC) handle video quality, we conducted a series of tests encoding and recording with each codec with OBS. The test aimed to observe how well each codec manages visual quality under, Below are the results of our tests:
Test setup:
Resolutions: 1080p and 4K
Video encoders:
Bitrate: 4000 kbps (1080p) and 15,000 kbps (4K)
Rate control: CBR (Constant bitrate)
Keyframe interval: 2 seconds
Test results:
Codec is evolving rapidly, with AV1 emerging as a promising standard for high-quality streaming. Its superior compression efficiency and royalty-free status make it an attractive option for future-proofing streaming services. Meanwhile, H.266 (VVC) is on the horizon, promising even greater efficiency and reduced data consumption.
Understanding the performance trade-offs of these codecs is important when integrating them into your video streaming pipeline:
Each codec has its use cases and considerations for developers:
When it comes to OTT (Over-the-Top) and streaming services, codec selection plays a vital role in delivering high-quality content to users across a wide variety of devices. H.264 is often the go-to choice for most IPTV/OTT providers due to its broad compatibility, making it easier to stream across smart TVs, mobile devices, browsers, and set-top boxes. This codec remains cost-effective, especially for live broadcasts, where minimizing bandwidth while maintaining quality.
On the other hand, H.265 (HEVC) offers better video compression and quality at the same bitrate as H.264, but it comes with higher licensing fees. This codec is favoured for 4K and HDR streaming, but its cost makes it less accessible for smaller platforms.
As the future of streaming evolves, AV1 is gaining momentum due to its royalty-free nature, especially in UGC and online-event broadcasting. Platforms are leaning towards AV1 because of its improved compression and the fact that it reduces bandwidth usage without sacrificing video quality.
Choosing the right video codec is crucial for ensuring both quality and performance in streaming. Based on our tests, AV1 offers superior compression and quality, making it ideal for bandwidth-sensitive applications. H.265 balances quality and compression for 4K and HDR, while H.264 remains the go-to for broad compatibility and live streaming.
As you select the right codec for your needs, it's also important to consider the broader tools that can simplify your workflow. FastPix offers a range of features designed to optimize video delivery, from seamless encoding to multi-CDN support. Check out all the features FastPix has to offer on our feature page.
AV1 offers up to 50% better video compression than H.264, saving storage and bandwidth without sacrificing quality. It’s royalty-free, supports ultra-high resolutions like 8K and beyond, and delivers excellent quality even at lower bitrates.
For streaming services, AV1 is ideal due to its efficiency and cost savings. Live streaming works better with H.264 or H.265 for faster performance. High-resolution content, such as 4K or 8K, benefits most from AV1’s advanced features, while older devices are better suited for H.264, ensuring compatibility.
While no one can predict the future, AV1’s advanced compression techniques and efficiency make it a strong contender. Its ability to deliver high-quality video with lower bandwidth usage positions it well for widespread adoption, but it’s still too early to say if it will dominate.
Yes, YouTube is adopting AV1 to deliver better streaming quality and efficiency, ensuring smoother playback and reduced data usage.
Yes, Discord has been one of the first communication platforms to support AV1, catering to gamers and those seeking the latest technology.
AV1’s drawbacks include high computational demands, limited hardware support, potential licensing complexities, and increased bandwidth requirements in some cases.
For high-resolution H.265 encoders, the ZEUS DMD-20 H.265 and H.264 Encoder is recommended, supporting 4K and HD resolutions.
Both VP9 and HEVC (H.265) have their strengths. VP9 offers open-source benefits and is well-supported by Google platforms, while HEVC provides better compression and quality for 4K content but involves licensing fees. The choice depends on specific needs and use cases.
AV2 is the successor to AV1, offering even better compression efficiency and quality, with improvements for high-resolution videos and lower power consumption.