For developers working with video streaming platforms, codec selection can make or break the user experience. Choosing the right codec is not just about compressing video; it’s about balancing quality, performance, and resource utilization. With AV1, H.264, and H.265 being the most widely discussed codecs, this guide will help you understand their strengths, weaknesses, and when to use each one in your development workflow.
Codecs are the engines behind video compression, allowing developers to efficiently deliver content to users with varying network conditions, devices, and bandwidth. Whether you're working on live streaming, video-on-demand (VOD), or conferencing platforms, the codec you choose can drastically impact your streaming performance.
Now that we have a better understanding of codecs and some of the most popular ones, let's take a closer look at AV1, H.264, and H.265 to explore their unique features and differences.
AV1 (AO media video 1) is a modern video codec developed by the Alliance for open media, a consortium of major tech companies including Google, Apple, and Microsoft. AV1 is designed to offer superior compression efficiency and high video quality while being open-source and royalty-free. This codec supports high-definition (HD) and ultra-high-definition (UHD) video, making it a great choice for high-quality streaming.
Key features:
H.265 (High-efficiency video coding, HEVC) is the successor to H.264, developed by ISO/MPEG and ITU-T video coding experts group. H.265 enhances video quality and compression efficiency, supporting higher resolutions like 4K and HDR. Although it delivers better performance compared to H.264, it comes with complex licensing fees and variable support across different platforms.
Key features:
H.264, also known as Advanced video coding (AVC), is a widely used codec that compresses and transmits video efficiently across various platforms. As a predecessor to H.265, H.264 is known for its broad compatibility and efficient performance. It remains a popular choice due to its extensive device support and lower encoding costs.
Key features:
For a clear and concise comparison of AV1, H.265, and H.264, you can check the table below. It highlights the key features and differences between these codecs to help you make an informed choice:
To provide a comprehensive understanding of how AV1, H.264, and H.265 (HEVC) handle video quality, we conducted a series of tests encoding and recording with each codec with OBS. The test aimed to observe how well each codec manages visual quality under, Below are the results of our tests:
Test setup:
Resolutions: 1080p and 4K
Video encoders:
Bitrate: 4000 kbps (1080p) and 15,000 kbps (4K)
Rate control: CBR (Constant bitrate)
Keyframe interval: 2 seconds
Test results:
Codec is evolving rapidly, with AV1 emerging as a promising standard for high-quality streaming. Its superior compression efficiency and royalty-free status make it an attractive option for future-proofing streaming services. Meanwhile, H.266 (VVC) is on the horizon, promising even greater efficiency and reduced data consumption.
Understanding the performance trade-offs of these codecs is important when integrating them into your video streaming pipeline:
Each codec has its use cases and considerations for developers:
When it comes to OTT (Over-the-Top) and streaming services, codec selection plays a vital role in delivering high-quality content to users across a wide variety of devices. H.264 is often the go-to choice for most IPTV/OTT providers due to its broad compatibility, making it easier to stream across smart TVs, mobile devices, browsers, and set-top boxes. This codec remains cost-effective, especially for live broadcasts, where minimizing bandwidth while maintaining quality.
On the other hand, H.265 (HEVC) offers better video compression and quality at the same bitrate as H.264, but it comes with higher licensing fees. This codec is favoured for 4K and HDR streaming, but its cost makes it less accessible for smaller platforms.
As the future of streaming evolves, AV1 is gaining momentum due to its royalty-free nature, especially in UGC and online-event broadcasting. Platforms are leaning towards AV1 because of its improved compression and the fact that it reduces bandwidth usage without sacrificing video quality.
Choosing the right video codec is a big decision that can directly impact both streaming quality and user experience.
Based on our test: AV1 delivers exceptional compression efficiency and better video quality, making it an excellent choice for high-resolution and bandwidth-sensitive applications. Its open-source and royalty-free nature make it a strong contender for future-proofing video streaming services, especially as device compatibility continues to grow.
H.265 offers a solid balance between quality and compression, particularly for 4K and HDR content, but its licensing fees and hardware requirements can be limiting for smaller platforms.
H.264, while less efficient compared to its successors, remains the most widely supported codec across devices, making it ideal for applications prioritizing compatibility and encoding speed, such as live streaming.
For developers looking to optimize their video streaming workflows, the right codec depends on your specific needs whether it's balancing quality with computational resources or ensuring broad compatibility.
At FastPix, we provide the infrastructure and technologies to streamline video development. By simplifying the technical complexities with video codecs, developers and product builders can concentrate on what truly matters: delivering better viewing experiences.
With features like multiple input formats, you can effortlessly use AV1, H.265, or H.264 video codecs into your streaming workflow. FastPix ensures optimal codec performance, allowing you to maximize compression efficiency while minimizing latency and buffering. Our platform supports seamless encoding, transcoding, and multi-CDN delivery, enabling you to reach audiences across diverse devices and bandwidth conditions.
No one knows the future yet. While AV1 has advanced coding algorithms and techniques, making it a strong candidate for future use, it's too early to definitively say that it is the future.
Yes, YouTube is adopting AV1 to provide higher efficiency and quality in video streaming.
Yes, Discord has been one of the first communication platforms to support AV1, catering to gamers and those seeking the latest technology.
Yes, AV1 is considered to have better compression efficiency compared to previous codecs. It also offers improved quality and future-proofing benefits.
Despite its advantages, AV1 has downsides including high computational demands, limited hardware support, potential licensing and pooling uncertainties, and higher bandwidth requirements.
For high-resolution H.265 encoders, the ZEUS DMD-20 H.265 and H.264 Encoder is recommended, supporting 4K and HD resolutions.
Both VP9 and HEVC (H.265) have their strengths. VP9 offers open-source benefits and is well-supported by Google platforms, while HEVC provides better compression and quality for 4K content but involves licensing fees. The choice depends on specific needs and use cases.